|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 07-Apr-2019 14:55 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.50 |
| Comment: |
The LB10-X replacing the old AC/10 is a good idea and solves the ammo shortage of the original but in a 3050 environment thats much too little upgrade here.
At least now the heatsinks had to be removed for something useful. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 23-Nov-2007 23:20 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
There was an upgrade in AC range and ammo load, but that's hardly enough to keep the 'Mech's performance in 3050's. It's still over-sinked, and I think that with six tons you should be able to get something more... what about a gauss rifle...? |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Knightrunner : 21-Jul-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
0.50 |
| Comment: |
This actually has similar, but less, firepower than the Wolf Trap and the 3025 Griffin. While the heavy armor and standard engine are nice, this mech does not have the firepower to be moving 4/6/0 and the standard engine is sitting right on top of 24 LRM-5 salvos. At least there are plenty of expendable heat sinks that might absorb critical hits.
The 6 single heat sinks are the most incomprehensible part of this "upgrade". Why spend all that money on a shiny new LB 10-X and waste six tons on nothing? Not even CASE? Sometimes additional single heat sinks make sense, but they didn't in the original Hoplite, and they certainly don't here.
This mech is weak for 3025; against modern designs it's just a waste of a nice cannon. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - ralgith : 11-Feb-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.50 |
| Comment: |
Can we say "downgrade" kiddies? Man, what were the designers of this thing ON anyways? LRM-5 is just a paper cut weapon here, and the LBX does not have the staying power a medium mech needs.... |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 25-Oct-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.00 |
| Comment: |
Now this is just plain stupid. You have sixteen single heat sinks that you don't need, and you downgrade the LRM rack to make room for more armor. Wolf's Dragoons deserved to be killed off by the Wobblies if this is the sort of upgrades they're putting out. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
LB 10-X AC
4. Empty 4. Empty 4.
LB 10-X AC
5. Empty 5. Sensors 5.
LB 10-X AC
3. Empty 3. Empty
4. Empty 4. Empty
5. Empty 5. Empty
6. Empty 6. Empty
Left Torso Center Torso Right Torso
1. Heat Sink 1. Fusion Engine 1. Heat Sink
2. Heat Sink 2. Fusion Engine 2. Heat Sink
3. Empty 3. Fusion Engine 3. LB 10-X AC (Ammo 10)
4. Empty 4. Gyro 4. LB 10-X AC (Ammo 10) [Cluster]
5. Empty 5. Gyro 5. Empty
6. Empty 6. Gyro 6. Empty
1. Empty 1. Gyro 1. Empty
2. Empty 2. Fusion Engine 2. Empty
3. Empty 3. Fusion Engine 3. Empty
4. Empty 4. Fusion Engine 4. Empty
5. Empty 5. LRM 5 (Ammo 24) 5. Empty
6. Empty 6. Empty 6. Empty
Left Leg Right Leg
1. Hip 1. Hip
2. Upper Leg Actuator 2. Upper Leg Actuator
3. Lower Leg Actuator 3. Lower Leg Actuator
4. Foot Actuator 4. Foot Actuator
5. Heat Sink 5. Heat Sink
6. Heat Sink 6. Heat Sink
Write Review