|
Member Review - jymset : 07-Jul-2008 21:08 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Generally, this is very solid. Compared to the Nova E, this only lacks some medium lasers, but gains a great amount of speed. The huge ATM launcher is worthy of note, the total damage is solid and heat is manageable. However, there is the matter of the similar C configurations (which is blatantly superior) that reduces any and all appeal of this configuration markedly. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 11-Oct-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
Well, it could be worse, but the firepower is kind of weak. In close this would be dangerous packing HE rounds. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - DarkAdder : 18-Jan-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
Didnt they try this one with the Nova? The ATM is a good system, but Im not sure that its a good system to rely on for all of your long missile needs. The ERs are a good in close and if-all-else-fails weapon to back up the ATMs. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
ATM 12 3. Cockpit 3. ER Medium Laser
4.
ATM 12 4. Empty 4. ER Medium Laser
5.
ATM 12 1. Endo Steel
2. ATM 12 (Ammo 5) 2. Empty
3. ATM 12 (Ammo 5) [ER] 3. Empty
4. ATM 12 (Ammo 5) [HE] 4. Empty
5. Ferro-Fibrous 5. Empty
6. Ferro-Fibrous 6. Empty
Left Torso Center Torso Right Torso
1. XL Engine 1. XL Engine 1. XL Engine
2. XL Engine 2. XL Engine 2. XL Engine
3. Endo Steel 3. XL Engine 3. Ferro-Fibrous
4. Endo Steel 4. Gyro 4. Ferro-Fibrous
5. Endo Steel 5. Gyro 5. Ferro-Fibrous
6. Empty 6. Gyro 6. Empty
1. Empty 1. Gyro 1. Empty
2. Empty 2. XL Engine 2. Empty
3. Empty 3. XL Engine 3. Empty
4. Empty 4. XL Engine 4. Empty
5. Empty 5.
Write Review