|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 01-May-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.50 |
| Comment: |
I think that standard 3025 model will beat it. Artemis for LRM-5 is clear waste of money and ammo in CT is placed awkwardly at best. Armor is good but CASE is another useless thing. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - jymset : 30-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
0.50 |
| Comment: |
Look at Blackhand's review for a comprehensive list of errors.
On top of that:
Artemis IV is great on LRM20s and maybe 15s. It's of dubious use on LRM10s and downright awful on LRM5s. Either stick with a larger launcher if you want that system, or take extra ammo instead.
I'm not crazy about that ERML, especially since this design now mounts one SINGLE heat sink less than the original. But seeing that this one is also slower, it may be a good idea.
Dunno, this one seems like a waste on all fronts. I would really stick with the original QA |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 27-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.00 |
| Comment: |
There's a bunch of flaws there that, when taken all together, really hurt this 'mech. Mounting the LRMs in 5-pods might seem smart at first, but you've got to mount two artemis units here instead of the single one you'd need for an LRM-10, costing you a ton of space. Putting the ammo in the center torso is never a smart idea; you're one golden BB away from destruction, and it renders CASE worthless. For these dubious "upgrades" you've sacrificed a point of jump movement and a heat sink? |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 22-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Its a 3050 design, marked in 3025.
Not being able to jump 5 now is going to bite you in the butt repeatedly. 6 tons of armour is nice, but its never enough. Heat shouldn't be a problem but I don't think you really have a need for Artemis when your only firing 5 pod LRMs.
CASEing and putting the ammo in the center torso is a hair raising idea. As it won't do what you hope. It'd be better off in one of the side torsos so your mech could still work. Its easier to replace LRM5 + Artemis Rack than it is it replace the whole mech.
|
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Motown Scrapper : 13-Jun-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
This mech is slow for its weight class the aromour load is good but it has a weak weapon load out Artemis on LRM 5s are a poor use of tonnage on average you add one point of damage for one ton of equipment.poor trade off better to use that tonage for two more laseres or a third launcher. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Write Review