|
Member Review : 11-Aug-2026 09:00 |
|
|
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Nobori-nin (Huntsman) Z-C |
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Seems to lack heat balance consideration for active NOVA CEWS while brawling in the close bracket, where it's needed most. Recommend trading 1t ammo for 1 DHS; endurance at range not necessary to role. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 15-Jul-2026 02:18 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
(Solaris-Custom) No-Dachi (Matagi) NDA-3S |
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
No fine heat control; leaves quite a bit on the table. I can see part of a plan with a kickstart running alpha - 15+6+6+2=29. But I would trade 2t ammo, 1t armor for an ERML+MPL. Then you only need to turn off one heat sink in the close bracket while the 4/5 heat is your walk-run adjustment.
I appreciate someone who knows about Matagi hunters. Tempted to see a Mine Dispenser; I've used the Matagi name myself. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 22-Jun-2026 13:11 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Valkyrie VLK-QD-X |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
I like what this is doing with simple components - way more than I thought I would. Surprisingly classy. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 18-Jun-2026 05:07 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Atlas AS7-NEVERMORE |
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Not enough ammo, but very ambitious for durability. Needs secondary armament. I think I'll be using this as inspiration. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 18-Jun-2026 05:05 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Grasshopper GHR-5Ja |
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Appropriate, with a surprisingly useful feel. Too much ammo; I'd consider trading it for LPL or LXPL in the CT, or enhancing the SRM-2 to a 4. Plenty of space for Ferro-Fib to enhance the ECM to AECM and round out the design. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 18-Jun-2026 04:58 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Highlander HGN-732LB2 |
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
Very short on ammo and highly vulnerable to having one torso removed. Is it for a specific Solaris duel? Confusing. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 18-Jun-2026 04:48 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Raptor RTX1-ODK |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
The price is right and it's a good scout. A superior choice. The ER Smalls don't quite appeal to me, but have a niche in crit-seeking, |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 18-Jun-2026 04:40 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Warhammer (SWOLEHAMMER) T52 |
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
It is, and succeeds while not being too excessive... But I expected TSM for some reason, and find myself wronged for no reason. 1/2 star penalty. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 17-Jun-2026 01:41 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Cougar KN |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Relatively cheap and effective for what it is. Slow, somewhat fragile, imperfect. ... But I'll be copying it into Megamek. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 06-Jun-2026 14:59 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Mauler "Crimson Cavaliers" MAL-1R-SCC |
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
A bit anachronistic for the era; doesn't quite seem historical. Actual non-prototype double heat sinks, non-prototype XL when it was rediscovered by the Lyrans in 3035, don't seem ready for 3039.
If it were historical, I think it'd be something more like
this |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
