|
Member Review : 02-Jul-2026 03:01 |
|
|
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Rakshasa ((Shapeshifter)) [BASE] |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Ok. I can see the vision for this design. I like the idea. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 18-Jun-2026 03:43 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Morticia MIA-69 |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Finally a record of The State's battlemech capabilities. The Mech is... very normal. Certainly a solid trooper mech for light engagements. It is light for its role by our standards.
The descriptor of the pilot program is interesting. Genetic Slavery is still evident, but at least these women seem to be treated more as people, unlike their sisters who end up in life support coffins on light vehicles. Our guess is the mechwarrior pilots came first, but were devalued as people as their population increased, leading to them becoming just commodities to install in cheap vehicles.
The use of Clones is perhaps not the brightest idea from their command. While the baseline pilot is no doubt capable, they will also have statistically relevant blind-spots in their thinking. This is potentially a flaw that could be exploited to shape engagements into a more cost effective victory. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 05-Jun-2026 16:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 03-May-2026 05:35 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
The killer of fun |
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
The Chameleon System is functionally useless on this. All it does is take up space and add heat. There is also my usual complaint about a lack of fluff. Otherwise yep, it has many mech like qualities. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 28-Feb-2026 10:57 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
High Score BV-9701 |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Ok, I see what you tried to do. Going for a frankenmech to try and edge out a few extra points of structure. Unfortunately, That makes the mech .5 tons overweight. Which is not showing on this readout, but is showing up when I attempt to recreate the mech. Bigger parts add mass. And unfortunately if that mass was available it would tend to be better to add more armor then structure.
Good and subtle attempt to raise the limit though. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 09-Sep-2025 10:40 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
HawkWolf HWK-5F |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Hawkwolf is just one of those designs I like. And this is a completely normal variant of it. I fully approve. Just wish there was at least some fluff explaining why or how it came to be. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 09-May-2025 19:23 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Champion CHM-P1N |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
I found the shenanigans involved with the movement profile to be suprising and funny. Very important traits IMO. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 30-Apr-2025 01:23 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Praetorian PRN-1H |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
I think this one is kinda asking for a cheaper variant with a standard engine and an AC-10.
The fluff is what sells the mech. Makes it a "I can see them doing that" design. And then it does a good job at the thing its supposed to do. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 29-Apr-2025 01:51 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Never Out NO1-? |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Ah yes... infinite repeaters.
And the fact that you even attempted actual fluff for a silly design is worth bonus points.
Interestingly enough... I carry an even greater ratio of ammo to gun for my naval PDS. But warships have the tonnage to spare. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 29-Apr-2025 01:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Malus ("Project Far Cry") M41-US |
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Could use a command console, and there is enough slack you could fit one. Armored cockpit, ppc capacitor, and downgrading the angel ecm and case. And then you'd have the trifecta of ghost targets. Or all the initiative bonuses. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
